ちなみに、 LaTeXのソースは以下の通り。 Tabular を使っている意味があまりないか、、また \vspace{1em} も、なんとかならないか。
\resume.. 以下の6行の塊は、マクロにしてしまえば、いいかとか悩みは尽きないのだった。
\begin{multicols}{2}
\section{B. C. M., 1881-01(1881-03)}
% p101/pdf111 Nunber 1-8
\resumechessgame[id=No.1]
\subsection{\xskakgetgame{gameid} \xskakgetgame{composer}}
\begin{tabular}{l}
\chessboard \\
\xskakgetgame{stipulation}
\end{tabular}
l B to R5, P to B6(a), 2 B to K8, Any move, 3 Mates accordingly.
(a) 1 QP moves, 2 Kt takes P ch, \&c.
\vspace{1em}
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
1 \bishop h5 & c3 & 2 \bishop e8 & $\sim$ & 3 \# \\
1 ... & d5 & 2 \knight xd2 & \king e2 & 3 \rook d4 \#
\end{tabular}
\vspace{1em}
\begin{description}
\item[H. Blanchard]Difficult. The waiting move of the \bishop\ and his return to the
original position are very pretty. Construction very good.
\item[B. G. Laws]Difficult and clever. Other solutions ingeniously avoided.
\item[R. K. L.]Pretty, but the retreat of \bishop is the only difficulty.
\item[W. Jay]Interesting and pretty. Worthy of its talented author.
\item[J. P. Lea]Little variety and less difficulty.
\item[R. W. Johnson]First move easy; subsequent block neat but incurs waste of power.
\item[Gamma]Solution neat, machinery somewhat cumbrous.
\item[Mercutio]A bright spark from the anvil of a veteran craftsman.
\item[P. Le Page, Jun., Guernsey]The second move in mainplay is rather dark, other solutions well prevented.
\end{description}
East Marden and J. Bryning are wrong.
Neither 1 \knight h4 nor 1. \bishop f7 will answer.